Yeah BB, you dink! Sean did it as you requested, try to keep up!! >ff ++++++++++++ Hmpfffh ... by actual measurement, half of a wheel well opening on a '71 is 14.75", FAR more than I requested.
I moved it back 'about' a half a wheel well. Take your 14.75", +/- 3", and I'm in spec. Without actually measuring the width with pixels, it's the best I could do.
And why didn't you measure the width with pixels? Come on, the dude asked for a favor. At least do it right.
And why didn't you measure the width with pixels? Come on, the dude asked for a favor. At least do it right. >ff +++++++++++ Just wait till the next time he wants a pic of the naked underbelly of RatChero -- see how well that is received.
I'll guess right now it will be at night with no flash. He deserves it. Can you believe the nerve of the guy?
OK, you two turd burglers, here is Tim's Ranchero with exactly 8" of setback (assuming he has 15" wheels, 8" = 53 pixels). I think it still looks like crap (not the Ranchero Tim, that is awesome).
"...here is Tim's Ranchero with exactly 8" of setback .." +++++++++++ Thanks, to my eye that looks about right. It would play hell with the gas tank, though. If you go back up the thread to that side view of the '66, it's obvious the overhang behind the rear axle is out of proportion [and the lovely '71 has the same problem] -- no real truck looks like that.